Cut method
The second and most important factor affecting the light performance of a polished natural diamond is its cut. How a diamond is cut—its unique arrangement of facets—greatly affects the amount of light reflected back to the viewer. GIA studied diamond cuts for decades and analyzed tens of thousands of proportion sets before their cut grading system was introduced in 2005. It had to be scientific, practical, and applicable to the jewellery industry and the public. There were more than 70,000 observations of 2,300 diamonds in studies conducted across all sectors of the jewellery industry—diamond manufacturers, dealers, retailers, and potential customers. The research behind their cut grades is undeniable. The quality and method of cut will greatly impact a diamond’s light performance score. The combined effects of proportion, symmetry, and polish can greatly influence how well a diamond reflects and refracts light. Well-cut diamonds maximize light return and minimize light leakage, leading to greater overall beauty (see Figure 1). The brightest diamonds with optimum light performance receive a cut grade of ‘Ultimate’ by Sarine, achieving quadruple 0’s in brilliance, sparkle, fire, and symmetry (see Figure 2). AGS’s ASET technology is another renowned way of measuring light performance in a diamond (See Figures 3, 4, and 5. Many jewellers are not as familiar with these so-called “green-grey maps” as they could be. They show a scan of the diamond and how light behaves within the diamond. Red is for brightness. Whenever you see a lot of red, it means the diamond is extremely bright. Blue is for contrast. Contrast is necessary for the diamonds to sparkle. Green areas on the maps show where the diamond is less bright. All diamonds will have some areas of green, but the highest light